Free DEI Strategy Presentation Template

A DEI strategy presentation is not a corporate compliance exercise. At its best, it is a rigorous examination of where the organization is, where gaps exist, and what specific actions leadership has committed to taking. Done well, it earns trust with employees, shareholders, and the board. Done poorly — with cherry-picked data, vague commitments, and the same slide deck recycled year after year — it damages credibility more than silence would.

This template covers the full scope of a rigorous DEI strategy presentation: the data, the methodology, the commitments, and the forward priorities.

Slide Structure Overview

1. Executive summary
2. Representation data by level
3. Pay equity analysis
4. Recruiting pipeline diversity
5. Belonging survey scores
6. ERG engagement metrics
7. Inclusive leadership training
8. Commitments made vs. delivered audit
9. Next-year priorities: impact/effort matrix
10. Appendix: methodology notes

---

Section 1: Executive Summary

One slide. State the year's most important findings — both improvements and persistent gaps — and the three to five priorities for the next year. Resist the temptation to lead with the good news. Credibility comes from leading with the honest picture.

Speaker note guidance: The CEO or CHRO typically presents this section. Prepare a two-minute verbal framing that acknowledges what worked, names what did not, and previews what the organization will do differently.

---

Section 2: Representation Data by Level

This is the foundational data. Everything else flows from it.

What to show: Gender representation (using the categories your HRIS system collects) and race/ethnicity representation (using U.S. EEO-1 categories or local equivalents for non-U.S. operations), broken down by:

• Individual contributor (IC)
• Manager (people manager, no direct management of other managers)
• Senior manager / Director
• Vice President / Senior Director
• C-suite and Executive Leadership Team

Visualization format: Use a funnel chart or a stacked bar series. The funnel format makes the representation decline from IC to executive visually immediate. A company where women represent 45% of ICs and 18% of the C-suite has a clear story in its funnel — present it without euphemism.

Why the funnel matters: Research from McKinsey's Women in the Workplace report consistently shows that the largest representation gap occurs at the first promotion to manager. In 2024 data, for every 100 men promoted to manager, 81 women were promoted. This "broken rung" effect compounds at every subsequent level. If your data shows the same pattern, naming it is important.

Year-over-year trend: Show at least two years of data for each level and demographic group. Directional trends matter more than any single snapshot. A 2-percentage-point improvement in senior director representation for underrepresented racial/ethnic groups over two years is meaningful progress; a 0.2-point improvement is not.

Data collection notes: Include a footnote on response rates for self-identification. If only 72% of employees have completed voluntary self-ID for race/ethnicity, say so. The board will ask.

---

Section 3: Pay Equity Analysis

Pay equity analysis is where many DEI presentations are most likely to mislead — by conflating the raw gap with the controlled gap, or by presenting a controlled gap without disclosing what variables were controlled.

Raw gap (unadjusted): The simple comparison of median compensation by gender or race/ethnicity, without controlling for any other factors. Raw gaps are often large (15 to 30 percent for gender in aggregate across industries) because they reflect differences in job level, tenure, and function rather than pay discrimination per se.

Controlled gap (adjusted): A regression-based analysis that controls for job level, tenure, geography, function, and performance rating — comparing employees doing similar work. Controlled gaps at well-run organizations typically fall in the range of 1 to 3 percent. A controlled gap above 5 percent is a flag.

What the analysis requires: A regression-based pay equity analysis requires a dataset with each employee's compensation, job level, tenure, function, geography, and performance rating. Tools like Syndio, Trusaic, and Mercer's Pay Equity Navigator automate this analysis. Conducting it once per year, before compensation cycles, allows you to remediate gaps before they are locked in.

What to report: Show both the raw gap and the controlled gap, and explain the difference in plain language. For example: "The raw median pay gap for women vs. men at our company is 17 percent. After controlling for job level, function, and tenure — that is, comparing people doing similar work — the adjusted gap is 2.1 percent. We are addressing the 2.1 percent controlled gap through targeted adjustments in the current compensation cycle."

Remediation budget: If you have conducted pay equity remediation, show the total dollar amount invested and the number of employees whose compensation was adjusted. This demonstrates that the analysis drives action.

---

Section 4: Recruiting Pipeline Diversity

Representation data shows the stock; recruiting pipeline data shows the flow. Both are required to understand the trajectory.

Metrics to track across the funnel:

• Application rate by demographic (what percentage of applicants self-identify in each group)
• Phone screen pass-through rate by demographic
• On-site / final round interview rate by demographic
• Offer rate by demographic
• Offer acceptance rate by demographic

Where to look for gaps: Application-to-offer conversion rate disparities indicate potential bias in screening or interviewing. Offer acceptance rate disparities may indicate compensation or culture concerns surfaced during the process.

Sourcing channel diversity: Track where diverse candidates are originating. Common sourcing channels for diverse candidate pipelines include Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCU) partnerships, the Management Leadership for Tomorrow (MLT) network, Lesbians Who Tech, and Out in Tech for LGBTQ+ candidates. Track which channels produce the highest application-to-hire conversion for underrepresented groups — and invest there.

Structured interview programs: If your organization uses structured interviews — standardized questions, scoring rubrics, diverse interview panels — show completion rates and correlate with offer rate equity. Research consistently shows that structured interviews reduce demographic disparities in hiring decisions.

---

Section 5: Belonging Survey Scores

Representation without belonging is retention risk. Belonging survey data captures the lived experience of employees who are already in the organization.

Tools: Culture Amp and Workday Peakon both have validated belonging and inclusion survey modules. Culture Amp's inclusion index includes dimensions like fairness, psychological safety, and sense of community. Peakon's belonging construct includes items about authenticity at work and team inclusion.

Benchmarks: On a 0-to-100 scale normalized by these platforms, a belonging score above 70 is generally considered strong; 60 to 70 is average; below 60 indicates a problem requiring immediate attention. Report your score relative to the platform benchmark for your industry and company size.

Disaggregation: The aggregate score is almost always misleading. Disaggregate by gender, race/ethnicity, level, department, and tenure band. A company-wide belonging score of 72 can mask a belonging score of 54 for a specific demographic group or within a specific function. The disaggregated view is the actionable view.

Response rate: A belonging survey with a 40% response rate has significant nonresponse bias risk. Report your response rate and note whether you weighted the results for known nonresponse patterns.

---

Section 6: ERG Engagement Metrics

Employee Resource Groups (ERGs) are a leading indicator of belonging and an organizational infrastructure investment. Track:

Membership percentage: What share of employees belong to at least one ERG? Best-in-class organizations typically see 25 to 40 percent of employees participating in ERGs.

ERG-specific metrics: Active members vs. nominal members (attended at least one event in the last 90 days), event attendance rate, membership growth year-over-year.

Executive sponsorship: Each ERG should have a C-suite or senior VP sponsor. Sponsorship is not ceremonial — the executive sponsor is expected to attend events, advocate for ERG priorities, and connect the ERG to business strategy. Track whether sponsors are meeting a minimum engagement bar (e.g., attend at least three ERG events per year, present at one ERG event per year).

Budget allocation: Show ERG budget as a percentage of total DEI budget and as a per-employee figure. Organizations that are serious about ERGs typically allocate $200 to $500 per ERG member per year for programming, travel, and external conference attendance.

---

Section 7: Inclusive Leadership Training

Training completion rates are necessary but not sufficient. Track behavior shift.

Completion rates: What percentage of managers and executives have completed inclusive leadership training? Target is 90% or above for required training. Show by level.

Training programs in use: Name the specific programs: Catalyst's MARC (Men Advocating Real Change) training, LinkedIn Learning's Unconscious Bias certification, or custom programs from vendors like LifeLabs Learning or Paradigm. Vague references to "bias training" do not convey rigor.

Behavior shift measurement: 360-degree feedback surveys that include inclusive leadership dimensions (psychological safety, equity in opportunity distribution, sponsorship behavior) are the strongest measure of behavior change. Culture Amp and Lattice both support inclusive leadership dimensions in their 360 modules. Show pre/post training scores if available.

---

Section 8: Commitments Made vs. Delivered Audit

If your organization made public or internal DEI commitments in prior years, audit them explicitly. Show each commitment, the metric that was to be achieved, and the current status.

This is often the hardest slide to present and the most important one for credibility. If a commitment was missed, say why — and say what changes next year to make it achievable.

---

Section 9: Next-Year Priorities: Impact/Effort Matrix

Limit to five to seven priorities. Plot each on a 2x2 matrix: impact on representation and belonging (y-axis) vs. implementation effort (x-axis). Quadrant labels: High Impact / Low Effort (do first), High Impact / High Effort (plan and resource), Low Impact / Low Effort (do if bandwidth permits), Low Impact / High Effort (deprioritize or eliminate).

For each high-priority initiative, assign an owner, a target metric, and a Q-by-Q milestone.

---

Using This Template in Slide-Deck.io

Slide-Deck.io's DEI template includes pre-built funnel chart layouts, disaggregated bar chart formats, the pay equity comparison slide with raw and controlled gap callouts, and the impact/effort matrix. All data fields are editable. Export to PDF for board distribution or share via live link for leadership team review.